Poker

Poker Dishonest Scandal Will get $15K Weirder

Robbi Jade Lew – the girl accused within the dishonest scandal nonetheless rocking the world of poker – was robbed of $15K in chips following the sport wherein she was accused of dishonest. And he or she doesn’t appear to care.

A press release launched by the Hustler On line casino Stay (HCL) Twitter account implicated a member of its manufacturing firm. In keeping with its assertion, Bryan Sagbigsal was fired after admitting to the theft of three $5K chips from Lew’s stack after the livestreamed Sept. 29 match.

Nonetheless, in her second gesture of weird generosity on this case, Lew refused to press fees with the Gardena Police Division, which declined to pursue a felony case with no sufferer.

Poker ace Garrett Adelstein glowers at rookie Robbi Jade Lew, whom he accuses of dishonest throughout a Hustler On line casino Stay poker recreation final week. Lew denies all accusations, regardless that she gave her $269K winnings again to Adelstein. (Picture: screengrab/Hustler Stay Stream)

In an announcement to Pokernews.com, Lew defined: “Upon studying that the worker was comparatively younger, with minimal funds, and no historical past of prior offenses, I got here to the conclusion that urgent fees was pointless to break a younger man’s life that will already be negatively impacted by the information of his wrongdoing and termination of his employment.”

Nonetheless, Pokernews.com additionally reported that Sagbigsal, 24, “was concerned in a theft and a jail escape in 2017, together with a battery cost from 2018, and was incarcerated on the California Division of Corrections in Sacramento.”

How A lot Weirder Can This Get?

The findings add a layer of bizarre to a saga that was already lots there. Throughout that Sept. 29 recreation, Lew, a beginner to video games with these stakes, made one of many wildest bets ever made on the poker felt. Her fully illogical name to Adelstein’s semi-bluff all-in grew the pot to $269K and precipitated one of many commentators to wonder if the cardboard graphics had misinterpret her hand.

Lew had basically nothing – no draw and solely a hope of a pair on the river. In keeping with a calculation by DraftKings, she had roughly 150 methods to lose her hand however solely six methods to win.

But win she did.

When Adelstein accused Lew of dishonest – and that is the half that poker followers have a tough time processing – she gave her winnings from the controversial hand ($135K) again to Adelstein. This forged a pall of suspicion round her. Eric Persson, a participant within the match, instructed the others on the desk: “She by no means ought to have given the cash again.”

Later, on Twitter, Lew claimed she gave the chips again as a result of Adelstein cornered and threatened her in a darkish hallway off-camera.

Swindlers on the Hustler? Model New Allegations

Initially, Adelstein took to Twitter, claiming he’d been “clearly cheated,” speculating that Lew might have had a card reader or been carrying a tool used to sign her.

After the information of Sagbigsal’s theft and Lew’s refusal to prosecute broke on Friday, Adelstein wrote a prolonged assertion on the TwoPlusTwo on-line poker boards. He accused Lew of dishonest with assist from Sagbigsal and Jacob “Rip” Chavez, who competed within the recreation in query.

“It’s extremely seemingly there have been situations when Bryan had entry to the opening playing cards, signaled details about these gap playing cards to RIP, Robbi, or probably each, and Robbi seemingly used this info to cheat in a number of arms over her 3 periods enjoying on HCL,” Adelstein wrote.

Adelstein offered no proof.

HCL remains to be investigating the case. In truth, its investigation is what uncovered the theft by Sagbigsal. HCL mentioned it was “hiring a regulation agency to conduct a complete investigation, which is able to embody employees and participant interviews, a evaluation of related information, and presumably the usage of polygraph testing.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button